Required reading

Goodman, A., Pepe, A., Blocker, A. W., Borgman, C. L., Cranmer, K., Crosas, M., Di Stefano, R., Gil, Y., Groth, P., Hedstrom, M., Hogg, D. W., Kashyap, V., Mahabal, A., Siemiginowska, A., & Slavkovic, A. (2014). Ten simple rules for the care and feeding of scientific data. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(4), e1003542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542  

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour , 1, 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021


Recommended reading

Borghi, John A. and Van Gulick, Ana E. (2021). Promoting Open Science Through Research Data Management. arXiv:2110.00888. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2110.00888

Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One term, five schools of thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing (pp. 17-47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2  

Laine, H. (2018). Open science and codes of conduct on research integrity. Informaatiotutkimus, 37(4), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.77414

Peels, R. (2019). Replicability and replication in the humanities. Research integrity and peer review, 4(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0060-4


Last modified: Friday, 30 September 2022, 10:56 AM